Monday, November 22, 2010

Fw: Meeting Agenda for Health & Safety


----- Forwarded by Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 11/22/2010 03:15 PM -----
Health & Safety - Minutes

Date Composed: 11/22/2010

Meeting Called By: Ted Brode/PTP/DCC/DCX

Topic:
Health & Safety

Sub Topic:

Site:
Red Deer

Logistics
Date: 11/05/2010    Time: 01:15 PM

Cycle: 2010CY3

Meeting Location: small conference room

Invitees:

Copy To:
Ted Brode/PTP/DCC/DCX, Kelsey Knutson/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Syl D Kucher/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Travis W Clark/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Local 815 CAW, Colin D Marshall/CARZ/DCC/DCX, local815.healthan-safety@blogger.com

Department:



      Minutes Documentation Area:


Minutes Editors:  Ted Brode/PTP/DCC/DCX, Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX

Attendees:  Ted Brode/PTP/DCC/DCX, Kelsey Knutson/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC, Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Travis W Clark/CARZ/DCC/DCX

Minutes:
AED checklist to be filled out monthly. This can happen during weekly walk around. Sheet are filled out and left in first aid room.

Safety goggles to be ordered for compact room ( Colin is in process of ordering)

Stop lines to be created by stretch wrap/Syl's area and D0143.

Honking becoming an issue again.
-Will be brought up at floor safety meeting

New mouth guards are in the first aid room.

post note
( goggles, safety glasses and face shield are in) (Thanks Colin!)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Optional:  Information on the Next Meeting


Next Meeting:
Meeting Called By: Ted Brode/PTP/DCC/DCX

Subject

Topic:
Health & Safety

Sub Topic:

Logistics
Date:     Time:

Location:
Ted's office

Invitees:



Agenda for next Meeting:

Comments:



Tuesday, October 5, 2010

MBOS Meeting Database Minutes

A Health & Safety meeting was held on 09/09/2010 at 10:00:00 AM. Please
use the attached document link to view the minutes.

Regards,
Julie D Rooks
(Document link: Database 'MBOS Meeting Database', View '(My Meetings &
Action Items)', Document 'Meeting Agenda for ')

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Let's all Drink Healthy

Nothing's better than a cool, creamy drink on a scorching hot day, but do you know exactly what and how much you're eating? Some of your favourite drinks can really pack on the pounds.

The biggest culprit is a peanut butter and chocolate milkshake and it can be found at some Tim Hortons thanks to the company's partnership with Cold Stone Creamery. It packs a whopping 2,010 calories, 131 grams of fat – 68 of that saturated – and 880 milligrams of sodium in just one 24-ounce serving.

Some of the other drinks include:

Tim Hortons Iced Cappuccino

Original (Small, cream) 250 calories- 11g of fat, 45mg of cholesterol, 50g of sodium, 33g of sugar

Original (Small, milk) 150 calories- 1.5g of fat, 5mg of cholesterol, 35g of sodium, 32g of sugar

Original (medium, cream) 360 calories, 15g of fat, 60mg of cholesterol, 70g of sodium, 46g of sugar

Original (large, cream) 470 calories, 20g of fat, 80mg of cholesterol, 90g of sodium, 62g of sugar



The popular Tim Hortons Iced Cappuccino is probably the healthiest dessert beverage out of the five choices, especially if you choose milk over cream. However if you ditch the cream, you cut the calories and, more importantly, the fat content,to a reasonable amount. An Original Tim Hortons Iced Cappuccino (small, milk) contains 150 calories, 1.5g of fat and 32g of sugar. If you replace the milk with cream, you are entering major weight-gain territory – a small contains 250 calories, 11g of fat and 33g of sugar.


Dairy Queen

Who doesn't love ice cream with a choice of toppings? Dairy Queen offers their popular Blizzard shake with a variety of toppings like chocolate, caramel and candy – all delicious, but eating a large Blizzard could blitz your diet and a small size provides you with at least half your recommended daily calories.

The Chocolate Xtreme Blizzard - Large: 650g/23 ounces
With chewy baked brownie pieces, choco chunks, cocoa fudge and Dairy Queen vanilla soft serve: 1,430 calories; total fat: 68g of fat – 38g of that saturated and 0.5g trans fat; 880 milligrams of sodium

The Chocolate Xtreme Blizzard - small: 287g/10 ounces
With chewy baked brownie pieces, choco chunks, cocoa fudge and Dairy Queen vanilla soft serve: 650 calories; total fat: 29g – 16 of that saturated and 0.5g trans fat; 370mg of sodium

The culprit? All those delicious toppings.

They taste great but add hundreds of calories to your treat. If you skip the chewy baked brownie pieces and the choco chunks and just get the vanilla soft serve and cocoa fudge, the small Chocolate Xtreme Blizzard becomes 420 calories and 16 grams of fat.


McDonald's McFlurry

Smarties McFlurry (Large)- 690 calories, 24g of fat, 79g of sugar, 460mg of sodium

Oreo McFlurry (small)- 500 calories, 17g of fat, 58g of sugar, 330g of sodium

It may look tiny and innocent, but even the small Oreo McFlurry is fattening. But that's nothing compared to a large Smarties McFlurry -- you may as well
just be eating a tub of ice cream.




Starbucks Frappuccino

Cafe Vanilla Frappuccino Blended Beverage -- Grande (medium) - two per cent milk, no whipped cream - 290 calories, 2g of fat, 210mg of sodium,
65g of sugar

The Starbucks Frapp is a summer staple, but people should probably enjoy this beverage once a year, based on how fatty and sugary it is.

A Cafe Vanilla Frappuccino (Grande, two per cent milk, no whipped cream) contains 290 calories, 2g of fat and 65g of sugar. Not too bad (aside from the sugar count,) but considering that many people add whipped cream, that will get you 410 calories, 13g of fat and 67g of sugar.

That is way over the daily fat and sugar content you should be ingesting. The one perk to being a Starbucks customer is the franchise gives you the option to choose non-fat milk, two per cent milk, whole milk, soy milk and whether you want cream on it. But despite this, the sugar count is still high.

The lesson here: always choose milk over cream and skip the extra toppings. They are always the most caloric part of these dessert drinks because they're basically pure fat and no one wants to add to their waistline in the summer.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Fw: Meeting Agenda for


----- Forwarded by Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/07/2010 02:41 PM -----
MBOS Meeting Database - Minutes

Date Composed: 05/07/2010

Meeting Called By: Alex Eliopoulos/CARZ/DCC/DCX

Topic:
JH&SC Meeting

Sub Topic:

Site:
Red Deer

Logistics
Date: 05/07/2010    Time: 01:00 PM

Cycle: 2010CY2

Meeting Location: small conference room

Invitees:
Alex Eliopoulos/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Kelsey Knutson/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Rick Traynor/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Travis W Clark/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX

Copy To:
Alex Eliopoulos/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Kelsey Knutson/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Rick Traynor/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Travis W Clark/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX, kenzelmuth@teamindustrial.com

Department:



      Minutes Documentation Area:


Minutes Editors:  Julie D Rooks/CARZ/DCC/DCX

Attendees:  Alex Eliopoulos/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Kelsey Knutson/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Rick Traynor/CARZ/DCC/DCX, Cal Thudium, Travis Clark, Julie Rooks

Minutes:
No incidents to report
No loss time due to injury

Walk around summary
-going well
     volatile room revamped and pallet locations fixed  (05/05/10)
Completed Safety Talks
-April 13,2010  Pedestrian & Vehicle Safety
-April 28,2010 OHS Pedestrian Safety
-May 6, 2010 Avoiding Strains & Sprains

Looking at doing Lock Out  training  May 12,2010.

 Old Business
-Oil Drums moved to floor

Yellow paint on new aisles and end of racks--------------put off until new lines and crosswalks are done inside.
(Please put ideas on paper to where stop lines and crosswalks should be.)

Open Issues
-student safety talks to be up to date by end of May ( Kelsey and Rick)
-Create a safety talk/Check database for eyeprotection in the compact room
---eye protection to be available and clean( add to TMS for keeping clean)
----add eye protection to safety walk sub list
-Not all doors and fire extinguishers are taped off, (add to tape list, not used very much, and don't need to be painted)
-Create New Stop line at end of aisle J1100/1200/Sask

Alex to check out packaging on Be03 - weight restrictions
                                     -36? used to be 18
Travis is cleaning up kits for spill team (needs respirators, )
                             
                                                               




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Optional:  Information on the Next Meeting


Next Meeting:
Meeting Called By: Alex Eliopoulos/CARZ/DCC/DCX

Subject

Topic:

Sub Topic:

Logistics
Date:     Time:

Location:

Invitees:



Agenda for next Meeting:

Comments:



Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Lets all eat healthy

As you likely already know, the latest buzz allover the Internet at the moment is the new fast food monstrosity, the KFC Double Down - a "sandwich" with no bread but rather two pieces of fried chicken with cheese sauce and bacon in between. I've resisted the urge to post on this up until now simply because I don't think this thing deserves any more press. But, after doing my best to keep quiet on it, the flood gates can be held closed no longer. This thing is evil.

It hardly seems worth the time to explain why this revolting thing with no food value isn't good for you, however, in addition to the few articles I've read complaining that the Double Down won't be making an appearance in Canada (hallelujah) I have actually read posts from people trying to justify its existence with comments like "not as bad as you might think" or "not even in the top ten of worst fast foods on the market."

The last comment inspired me to check out the site 10 Fast Food Items Worse For You Than the KFC Double Down. While we're on the subject of poor uses of time, evaluating and ranking these non-food items to determine that Burger King's Triple Whopper or Wendy's Chicken BLT Salad With Honey Dijon Dressing are "worse for you" than the KFC Double Down is kind of like saying losing your left kneecap is worse for you than losing your right.

The problem is that the system of evaluation they're using is completely irrelevant to judging the actual nutrition of these products. Calories, fat, sodium - these terms don't mean anything in regards to actual nutrition. What kind of calories? Where are they coming from? Empty calories or nutrient-dense calories? Is there any fibre in there? Are any of the non-calories coming from artificial sweeteners? What other toxic chemicals are put in there for flavouring, texturing or preservation?

And what kind of fat are they talking about? Processed, hydrogenated fat? Polyunsaturated fats that have been allowed to go rancid? Monounsaturated fats like olive oil? Or essential fats treated properly or maybe even healthy saturated fats like lauric acid? Not all fats are created equal, so just assigning a number to "fat" doesn't mean anything. You could have the lowest fat sandwich on the planet and still have it be absolutely horrible for you, or you could have a high fat sandwich, with avocado or olive oil pesto or butter, for example, and have it be a really nutrient-dense, health-promoting food. The idea that you should minimize and possibly eradicate fat from your diet, which is what is implied with these numbers if not explicitly stated, is probably one of the worst things you can do for your health. You need fat to survive.

And the idea that you want to take in as little calories as possible is damaging too - calories are energy! Why would you want to minimize that? This kind of reductionist view of food is exactly why there is an obesity epidemic. The worst processed garbage gets labeled as "healthy" because it minimizes fat, calories and sodium; meanwhile it contains toxic ingredients that actually make people fat and diseased. And natural, healthy foods that may happen to have a lot of fat, calories or sodium get labeled as poor choices. These evaluation systems are exactly why our planet is so confused about food right now. We reduce the idea of health to a series of numbers to be calculated while our critical faculties that could be used to easily discern what is good for us atrophy from lack of use.You know that the piece of chocolate cake isn't good for you, yet if you "work the numbers" it becomes something you're allowed to enjoy guilt-free. Too bad your body doesn't work like a calculator, because that chocolate cake is bad for it no matter how you slice it. And the more we "work the numbers" the more out of touch we get from our natural instincts toward healthy foods.

Until we reject these numeric systems and vow to begin eating real food the word "health" shouldn't even cross our lips. Eating this stuff isn't about nourishment, it's about entertainment and no matter what system we use to evaluate, our bodies are only so forgiving.


The Healthy Foodie is Doug DiPasquale, Holistic Nutritionist and trained chef, living in Toronto. Doug specializes in private in-home holistic cooking lessons. You can email him with inquiries or questions for the blog at dougthehealthyfoodie@gmail.com.